Arqueologia Distópica

A implementação da lógica do capital na gestão do patrimônio

Autores

  • Nicolas Zorzin

Palavras-chave:

Arqueologia comercial, gestão do patrimônio cultural, Austrália, Canadá, Japão

Resumo

Desde os anos 1980, a privatização do setor arqueológico espelha seu contexto político-econômico. Depois da crise financeira de 2008 e de seus efeitos devastadores na comunidade profissional, este sistema tem sido objeto de crescentes críticas. O objetivo deste artigo é demonstrar a configuração altamente problemática da arqueologia privada pra seus praticantes, para a cultura material e para a vasta maioria do público. Os sistemas da arqueologia em vários países são explorados, incluindo Canadá, Austrália e Japão. Uma mudança radical da lógica dominante do capital, no sentido de alternativas cooperativas e colaborativas, viáveis a longo prazo e reconectadas às pessoas no presente, é sugerida como uma alternativa mais factível..

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

ABORIGINAL HERITAGE ACT, 2006. Act No. 16/2006, assented to 9 May 2006, Aboriginal Affairs Victoria, Melbourne, 142p.

AGENCY OF CULTURAL AFFAIRS (Bunka-chō (文化庁), 2013. 埋蔵文化財関係統計資 (平成 25年3月).

AITCHISON, K.; EDWARDS, R., 2008. Discovering the archaeologists of Europe: United Kingdom - Archaeology Labour Market Intelligence: profiling the profession 2007/08. Institute of Field Archaeologists, Reading.

AITCHISON, K.; ROCKS‐MACQUEEN, D., 2013. Archaeology Labour Market Intelligence: profiling the profession 2012-13. Landward Research Ltd, Sheffield.

ASSELIN, P., 2014. Le Bourbier Woodfield. Le Soleil, 22 de janeiro.

AUGER, S., 2014. Moins de fouillis dans l’archéologie à Québec. Le Soleil, 6 de janeiro.

BARNES, G., 1999. The rise of civilization in East Asia. Thames & Hudson, Londres.

BERGMAN, C.; DOERSHUK, J., 2003. Cultural Resource Management and the business of archaeology. In: Ethical issues in archaeology, editado por Larry Zimmerman, Karen Vitelli e Julie Hollowell, pp 85-97. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Oxford.

BOURDIEU, P., 1998. The essence of neoliberalism. Le Monde Diplomatique, dezembro.

BRADLEY, R., 2006. Bridging the two cultures: commercial archaeology and the study of prehistoric Britain. The Antiquaries Journal 86:1-13.

BYRNE, D., 1996. Deep nation: Australia’s acquisition of an Indigenous past. Aboriginal History 20:82-107.

CARMAN, J., 2002. Archaeology & heritage. An introduction. Continuum, Londres.

CHAPPLE, R., 2014. “Oh, Margaret the lapping waves are licking quietly at our ankles”. The fall of commercial archaeology in Northern Ireland. The Robert M. Chapple Blog. http://rmchapple.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/oh-margaret-lapping-waves-are-licking.html

COLLEY, S., 2002. Uncovering Australia. Archaeology, Indigenous people and the public. Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest.

DARVILL, T.; RUSSELL, B., 2002. Archaeology after PPG16: archaeological investigations in England 1990-1999. DOI, Bournemouth.

DAVID, B.; BARKER, B., 2006. The social archaeology of Australian Indigenous societies.Aboriginal Studies Press, Canberra.

EDWARDS, W. 2005. Japanese archaeology and Cultural Properties Management. In: A companion to the anthropology of Japan, editado por Jennifer Robertson, pp 36-49. Blackwell, Oxford.

ERNST, A., 1992. From liberal continentalism to neoconservatism: North American Free Trade and the politics of the C.D. Howe Institute. Studies in Political Economy 39:109-140.

EVERILL, P., 2007. British professional field archaeology: antiquarians and labourers; developers and diggers. In: Archaeology and capitalism: from ethics to politics, editado por Yannis Hamilakis e Philip Duke, pp 119-136. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek.

EVERILL, P., 2009. Invisible diggers: a study of British commercial archaeology. Oxbow, Oxford.

FAWCETT, C. 1995. Nationalism and post war Japanese archaeology. In: Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology, editado por Philip Kohl e Clare Fawcett, pp 232-246. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

FOLEY, G. 1999. Reconciliation: fact or fiction? The Koori history website. http://www.kooriweb.org/foley/essays/essay_6.html

FOLEY, G.; ANDERSON, T., 2006. Land rights and Aboriginal voices. Australian Journal of Human Rights 12(1):83-108.

GATTINGER, M.; SAINT-PIERRE, D., 2010. The “neoliberal turn” in provincial cultural policy and administration in Québec and Ontario: the emergence of “quasi-neoliberal” approaches. Canadian Journal of Communication 35(2):279-302.

GNECCO, C.; LIPPERT, D. (Orgs.), 2015. Ethics and archaeological praxis. Springer, New York.

HAMILAKIS, Y; DUKE, P.(Orgs), 2007. Archaeology and capitalism: from ethics to politics. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek.

HUDSON, M., 2007. Japanese beginnings. In: A companion to Japanese history, editado por William Tsutsui, pp 13-29. Blackwell, Malden.

IKAWA-SMITH, F., 2010. Co-traditions in Japanese archaeology. World Archaeology 13(3):296-309.

IKAWA-SMITH, F. 2011. Practice of archaeology in contemporary Japan. In: Comparative archaeologies: a Sociological view of the science of the past, editado por Ludomir Lozny, pp 675-705. Springer, New York.

KEALLY, C. 2003. Japanese archaeology. Fieldwork opportunities in Japanese archaeology. http://www.t-net.ne.jp/~keally/fieldwork.html

KEMPF, H., 2009. Pour sauver la planète, sortez du capitalisme. Seuil, Paris.

KIKUCHI, T. 2011. Trends in Japanese archaeological research, 2008. Archaeologia Japonica, março, pp 1-14.

KIRIAMA, H. 2012. The Victorian Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006: five years on. In: Excavations, surveys and heritage management in Victoria, volume 1, editado por Ilya Berelov, Mark Eccleston e David Frankel, pp 67-74. La Trobe University, Melbourne.

LILLEY, I. (org.), 2000. Native title and the transformation of archaeology in the postcolonial world. University of Sydney, Sydney.

MERCER, D. 2003. “Citizen minus”? Indigenous Australians and the citizenship question. Citizenship Studies 7(4):421-444.

MIZOGUCHI, K. 2006. Archaeology, society and identity in modern Japan. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

MURRAY, T. 1992. Aboriginal (pre)history and Australian archaeology: the discourse of Australian prehistoric archaeology. Journal of Australian Studies 16(35):1-19.

OKAMURA, K., 2014. Ethics of commercial archaeology (Japan). In: Encyclopedia of global archaeology, editado por Claire Smith, pp 2482-2485. Springer, New York.

PIKETTY, T. 2013. Le capital au XXIe siècle. Seuil, Paris.

ROSS, W. 2012. Draconian cuts to Parks Canada. Canadian Archaeological Association (CAA). http://canadianarchaeology.com/caa/draconian-cuts-parks-canada

SHANKS, M.; MCGUIRE, R., 1996. The craft of archaeology. American Antiquity 61(1):75-88.

SHEPHERD, N., 2007. What does it mean “to give the past back to the people”? Archaeology and ethics in the postcolony. In: Archaeology and capitalism: from ethics to politics, editado por Yannis Hamilakis e Philip Duke, pp 99-114. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek.

SCHLANGER, N.; AITCHISON, K. (Orgs.)., 2010. Archaeology and the global economic crisis. Multiple impacts,possible solutions. Culture Lab Editions, Tervuren.

SMITH, C.; WOBST, M. (Orgs.), 2005. Indigenous archaeologies: decolonizing theory and practice. Routledge, New York.

SMITH, L., 2000. “Doing archaeology”: cultural heritage management and its role in identifying the link between archaeological practice and theory. International Journal of Heritage Studies 6(4):309-316.

SMITH, L., 2004. Archaeological theory and the politics of cultural heritage. Routledge, New York.

TANAKA, Y., 2011. Trends in Japanese archaeological research, 2009. Archaeologia Japonica, novembro, pp 1-6.

ULM, S.; MATE, G.; DALLEY, C.; NICHOLS, S., 2013. A working profile: the changing face of professional archaeology in Australia. Australian Archaeology 76:34-43.

VOGEL, S. 2006. Japan remodeled. How government and industry are reforming Japanese capitalism. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

WESTERN, M.; BAXTER, J. PAKULSKI, J.; TRANTER, B.; WESTERN, J.; VAN EGMOND, M.; CHESTERS, J.; HOSKING, A.; O'FLAHERTY, M.; VAN GELLECUM, Y., 2007. Neoliberalism, inequality and politics: the changing face of Australia. The Australian Journal of Social Issues 42(3):401-418.

ZIMMERMAN, L., 2008. Unusual or “extreme” beliefs about the past, community identity, and dealing with the fringe. In: Collaboration in archaeological practice: engaging descendent communities, editado por Chip Colwell-Chanthaphonh e Thomas Ferguson, pp 55-86. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek.

ZORZIN, N. 2010. Archéologie au Québec. Portrait d’une profession. Archéologiques 23:1-15.

ZORZIN, N. 2011a. Contextualising contract archaeology in Quebec. Political-economy and economic dependencies. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 26(1):119-135.

ZORZIN, N. 2011b. The political economy of a commercial archaeology. A Quebec case-study. Tese de doutorado, University of Southampton, Southampton.

ZORZIN, N. 2012. The political-economy of Victoria archaeology: an introduction and critical analysis. In: Excavations, surveys and heritage management in Victoria, volume 1, editado por Ilya Berelov, Mark Eccleston e David Frankel, pp 75-79. La Trobe University, Melbourne.

ZORZIN, N. 2013. The political-economy of Japanese archaeology: reflective thoughts on current organisational dynamics. Japanese Journal of Archaeology 1:1-17.

ZORZIN, N. 2014a Heritage management and Aboriginal minorities: relations in a global economy. The contemporary challenges of Victoria (Australia). Archaeologies 10(2):132-167.

ZORZIN, N. 2014b Socio-economics of archaeology in Victoria after the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006. In: Excavations, surveys and heritage management in Victoria, volumen 3, editado por Ilya Berelov, Mark Eccleston e David Frankel, pp 65-74. La Trobe University, Melbourne.

ZORZIN, N. 2015. Archaeology and capitalism: successful relationship or economic and ethical alienation? In: Ethics and archaeological praxis, editado por Cristóbal Gnecco e Dorothy Lippert, pp 115-139.Springer, New York.

Downloads

Publicado

2015-12-30

Como Citar

ZORZIN, N. . Arqueologia Distópica: A implementação da lógica do capital na gestão do patrimônio. Revista de Arqueologia, [S. l.], v. 28, n. 2, p. 97–117, 2015. Disponível em: https://revista.sabnet.org/ojs/index.php/sab/article/view/430. Acesso em: 19 ago. 2022.

Edição

Seção

Artigo